Skip to content

Use case · Education

Fair, specific feedback on student work

Get feedback on essays and assignments that separates factual errors from matters of judgement, with reasons a student can act on.

Ask things like

  • Give specific feedback on this essay: what works, what to improve and any factual errors.
  • Check the citations in this assignment against the attached sources.
  • Suggest a grade against this rubric, with reasons.

Example

What a education answer looks like

Every statement carries a label in words and the passage it rests on, so you can check the answer instead of trusting it.

Standard checkEssay: water cycle (sample).docx

Question

Give feedback on this essay against the rubric.

In short: Strong structure and correct science; the conclusion repeats the introduction and cites no source.

  1. 1Models agree

    Evaporation and condensation are explained correctly.

    “…water vapour cools as it rises and condenses into droplets…” (para. 2)

  2. 2Models agree

    The conclusion restates the introduction without new insight.

    Conclusion, sentences 1–2

  3. 3Opinion

    Adding one cited source would strengthen the argument.

    No passage in the document backs this.

Illustrative example. The document and its figures are fictional.

Why Danphe

Why education teams use a council

  • Facts vs opinions

    Statements that are judgements are labelled “Opinion”, so feedback on style is not presented as a factual finding.

  • Several markers

    Models from different companies assess the work independently; disagreements about a grade are shown, not averaged away.

  • Explainable

    Each point links to the passage in the student's work or the source it refers to.

Suggested depth: Full report for feedback; Standard for single questions.

Good to know

Use Danphe to support, not replace, a teacher's assessment. Do not upload personal data you are not allowed to share.

How it works

How each question is checked

  1. Step 1: Reading sources

    Your documents are read and the passages that matter to the question are found.

  2. Step 2: Models answer on their own

    Models from different companies answer independently, without seeing each other's answers.

  3. Step 3: Cross-checking every statement

    Each statement is checked against your sources by models from other companies, with quotes.

  4. Step 4: Writing the answer

    An editor writes the answer from what held up, and marks what didn't.

Next

Try it on your own documents

The Free plan includes 60 credits a month: about six Standard questions.